The Series A Crunch is Back: Why 85% of Seed-Stage Startups Now Fail to Raise Series A (And How to Beat the Odds)

Remember when raising a Series A was just about proving you had a decent product and some early traction? Those days are over.
The stark reality: only 15.4% of startups that raised a seed round in early 2022 were able to raise a Series A within two years, compared to 30.6% of companies that managed this feat back in 20181. That's a devastating 50% drop in success rates. For SaaS startups specifically, the numbers are even more brutal—success rates plunged from 37% in 2020 to just 12% by the first half of 20222.
As venture investor Tomasz Tunguz puts it, "the Series A Crunch has returned" in 20243, creating the same funding squeeze we saw during the 2012 "Seedpocalypse." But this time, it's worse.
Here's what's really happening: while everyone was celebrating the democratisation of seed funding, we created a massive supply-demand imbalance that's now crushing Series A hopefuls.
The explosion of micro-VCs, accelerators, and "spray and pray" seed investing created thousands more funded startups, but the number of legitimate Series A investors hasn't grown proportionally. According to original TechCrunch data analysis, we've seen a 33% increase in reported seeds and a 9.6% drop in reported Series A rounds6. The ratio of seed to Series A deals has gone from 1:1 in 2008 to roughly 2:1 by 2011, and the trend has only accelerated.
The result? More than 1,000 startups are getting "orphaned" each year—stranded between seed and Series A with nowhere to go.
The metrics that got you seed funding won't get you Series A. The old threshold of $1 million ARR that used to unlock Series A doors? That's now just table stakes. Investors have fundamentally raised the bar because they have so many options.
But here's the kicker—even hitting these numbers doesn't guarantee success. As the Founder Institute notes, "The 'Series A Crunch' that started in 2023 has only grown wider as the supply of seed-stage companies trying to raise A rounds has increased, enabling investors to be picky and operate from a position of great strength”.
In this hypercompetitive environment, one metric has emerged as the ultimate differentiator: the Rule of 40. This isn't just another vanity metric—it's become the primary lens through which Series A investors assess whether you've achieved sustainable, scalable growth.
Rule of 40 (%) = Revenue Growth Rate (%) + EBITDA Profit Margin (%)
Companies scoring greater than 40% on a weighted Rule of 40 basis are getting rewarded with median revenue multiples of 10.7x9—that's the difference between a good valuation and a great one.
According to Bain & Company's foundational research, software companies that outperform the Rule of 40 have valuations double that of companies that fall "below the line," and they achieve returns as much as 15% higher than the S&P 50010.
The beauty of the Rule of 40 is that it allows you to be unprofitable while still demonstrating financial discipline. A company growing 60% year-over-year with -20% EBITDA margins still hits the 40% threshold, proving they understand the trade-offs between growth and profitability.
Surviving the Series A Crunch isn't about having perfect metrics—it's about telling a coherent story where every number supports your narrative of sustainable growth. Investors can smell disconnected metrics from a mile away.
Due diligence has become rigorous from Series A onwards as investment capital becomes larger and comes mainly from institutional investors who follow structured processes. The startups that fail often do so due to easily preventable mistakes:
Having all your documentation together in one place before you sign a term sheet can cut as much as a week off your closing process. This includes:
2024 was the year of AI venture capital funding, with AI startups locking in 31% of global funding in Q3 202411. But don't let that fool you—while AI startups are getting bid up to 2021-level multiples, for classic SaaS companies, the Series A Crunch is brutally real.
This means bigger rounds for the winners, but drastically fewer winners overall.
Here's a surprising trend that's emerged from the data: companies that closed Series A rounds in the first half of 2024 had an average of 15.6 employees—16.3% lower than Series A companies five years ago15. Successful companies are doing more with less.
The median Series A round in Q1 2025 involved 17.9% dilution, down from 20.9% a year earlier16. Founders who demonstrate capital efficiency are keeping more of their companies while raising the same amounts.
The Series A Crunch isn't a bug—it's a feature. It's the market's way of separating companies that can build sustainable businesses from those riding the easy money wave.
Series A funding represents a critical transition where 60% of early-stage companies fail to reach. But the 15% that make it through aren't just surviving—they're thriving with higher valuations, better investors, and stronger foundations for the future.
The question isn't whether the Series A Crunch is real. The question is: will you be in the 15% that beats it, or the 85% that becomes a cautionary tale?
Your financial preparation isn't just about impressing investors—it's about proving you can build a business that not only survives but dominates in the most competitive startup environment we've ever seen.
Sources:
1. Carta. "State of Private Markets: Q3 2024." https://info.carta.com/rs/214-BTD-103/images/State%20of%20Private%20Markets%20Q3%202024%20-%20Green.pdf?version=0
2. Walker, Peter (Carta). https://www.linkedin.com/posts/peterjameswalker_cartadata-seed-seriesa-activity-7208861028799901696-As38/
3. Tunguz, Tomasz. "The Series A Crunch or the Seedpocalypse of 2024." June 21, 2024. https://tomtunguz.com/seedpocalypse-2024/
4. Konvoy VC. "Failure to Launch: The Series A Crunch." https://www.konvoy.vc/newsletters/failure-to-launch-the-series-a-crunch
5. Carta. "State of Private Markets: Q1 2025." May 13, 2025. https://carta.com/data/state-of-private-markets-q1-2025/
6. TechCrunch. "Are We In A Series A 'Crunch'? What CrunchBase Says." November 10, 2011. https://techcrunch.com/2011/11/09/crunchcrunch/
7. Founder Institute. "Startup Funding Benchmarks & Requirements." 2025. https://fi.co/benchmarks
8. Carta. "State of Private Markets: Q3 2024." https://info.carta.com/rs/214-BTD-103/images/State%20of%20Private%20Markets%20Q3%202024%20-%20Green.pdf?version=0
9. Software Equity Group. "2024 Annual SaaS Report." https://softwareequity.com/blog/rule-of-40/
10. Bain & Company. "Rule of 40 Study." 2017.
11. R&D World. "25 Landmark R&D-Heavy Tech Funding Rounds of 2024." https://www.rdworldonline.com/25-landmark-rd-heavy-tech-funding-rounds-of-2024/
12. AlleyWatch. "January 2025 US Venture Capital Fundraising Report."
13. Crunchbase. "After Slowing In 2023, US Median Round Size Again Growing." August 23, 2024. https://news.crunchbase.com/venture/us-median-round-size-growing-h1-2024/
14. Founder Institute. "Startup Funding Benchmarks & Requirements." 2025. https://fi.co/benchmarks
15. Carta. "State of Startup Compensation, H1 2024." September 30, 2024. https://carta.com/data/startup-compensation-h1-2024/
16. Carta. "State of Private Markets: Q1 2025." May 13, 2025. https://carta.com/data/state-of-private-markets-q1-2025/
17. Crunchbase. "Far Fewer Seed-Stage Startups Are Graduating To Series A — Raising The Risk Of Failure." January 29, 2025
Remember when raising a Series A was just about proving you had a decent product and some early traction? Those days are over.
The stark reality: only 15.4% of startups that raised a seed round in early 2022 were able to raise a Series A within two years, compared to 30.6% of companies that managed this feat back in 20181. That's a devastating 50% drop in success rates. For SaaS startups specifically, the numbers are even more brutal—success rates plunged from 37% in 2020 to just 12% by the first half of 20222.
As venture investor Tomasz Tunguz puts it, "the Series A Crunch has returned" in 20243, creating the same funding squeeze we saw during the 2012 "Seedpocalypse." But this time, it's worse.
Here's what's really happening: while everyone was celebrating the democratisation of seed funding, we created a massive supply-demand imbalance that's now crushing Series A hopefuls.
The explosion of micro-VCs, accelerators, and "spray and pray" seed investing created thousands more funded startups, but the number of legitimate Series A investors hasn't grown proportionally. According to original TechCrunch data analysis, we've seen a 33% increase in reported seeds and a 9.6% drop in reported Series A rounds6. The ratio of seed to Series A deals has gone from 1:1 in 2008 to roughly 2:1 by 2011, and the trend has only accelerated.
The result? More than 1,000 startups are getting "orphaned" each year—stranded between seed and Series A with nowhere to go.
The metrics that got you seed funding won't get you Series A. The old threshold of $1 million ARR that used to unlock Series A doors? That's now just table stakes. Investors have fundamentally raised the bar because they have so many options.
But here's the kicker—even hitting these numbers doesn't guarantee success. As the Founder Institute notes, "The 'Series A Crunch' that started in 2023 has only grown wider as the supply of seed-stage companies trying to raise A rounds has increased, enabling investors to be picky and operate from a position of great strength”.
In this hypercompetitive environment, one metric has emerged as the ultimate differentiator: the Rule of 40. This isn't just another vanity metric—it's become the primary lens through which Series A investors assess whether you've achieved sustainable, scalable growth.
Rule of 40 (%) = Revenue Growth Rate (%) + EBITDA Profit Margin (%)
Companies scoring greater than 40% on a weighted Rule of 40 basis are getting rewarded with median revenue multiples of 10.7x9—that's the difference between a good valuation and a great one.
According to Bain & Company's foundational research, software companies that outperform the Rule of 40 have valuations double that of companies that fall "below the line," and they achieve returns as much as 15% higher than the S&P 50010.
The beauty of the Rule of 40 is that it allows you to be unprofitable while still demonstrating financial discipline. A company growing 60% year-over-year with -20% EBITDA margins still hits the 40% threshold, proving they understand the trade-offs between growth and profitability.
Surviving the Series A Crunch isn't about having perfect metrics—it's about telling a coherent story where every number supports your narrative of sustainable growth. Investors can smell disconnected metrics from a mile away.
Due diligence has become rigorous from Series A onwards as investment capital becomes larger and comes mainly from institutional investors who follow structured processes. The startups that fail often do so due to easily preventable mistakes:
Having all your documentation together in one place before you sign a term sheet can cut as much as a week off your closing process. This includes:
2024 was the year of AI venture capital funding, with AI startups locking in 31% of global funding in Q3 202411. But don't let that fool you—while AI startups are getting bid up to 2021-level multiples, for classic SaaS companies, the Series A Crunch is brutally real.
This means bigger rounds for the winners, but drastically fewer winners overall.
Here's a surprising trend that's emerged from the data: companies that closed Series A rounds in the first half of 2024 had an average of 15.6 employees—16.3% lower than Series A companies five years ago15. Successful companies are doing more with less.
The median Series A round in Q1 2025 involved 17.9% dilution, down from 20.9% a year earlier16. Founders who demonstrate capital efficiency are keeping more of their companies while raising the same amounts.
The Series A Crunch isn't a bug—it's a feature. It's the market's way of separating companies that can build sustainable businesses from those riding the easy money wave.
Series A funding represents a critical transition where 60% of early-stage companies fail to reach. But the 15% that make it through aren't just surviving—they're thriving with higher valuations, better investors, and stronger foundations for the future.
The question isn't whether the Series A Crunch is real. The question is: will you be in the 15% that beats it, or the 85% that becomes a cautionary tale?
Your financial preparation isn't just about impressing investors—it's about proving you can build a business that not only survives but dominates in the most competitive startup environment we've ever seen.
Sources:
1. Carta. "State of Private Markets: Q3 2024." https://info.carta.com/rs/214-BTD-103/images/State%20of%20Private%20Markets%20Q3%202024%20-%20Green.pdf?version=0
2. Walker, Peter (Carta). https://www.linkedin.com/posts/peterjameswalker_cartadata-seed-seriesa-activity-7208861028799901696-As38/
3. Tunguz, Tomasz. "The Series A Crunch or the Seedpocalypse of 2024." June 21, 2024. https://tomtunguz.com/seedpocalypse-2024/
4. Konvoy VC. "Failure to Launch: The Series A Crunch." https://www.konvoy.vc/newsletters/failure-to-launch-the-series-a-crunch
5. Carta. "State of Private Markets: Q1 2025." May 13, 2025. https://carta.com/data/state-of-private-markets-q1-2025/
6. TechCrunch. "Are We In A Series A 'Crunch'? What CrunchBase Says." November 10, 2011. https://techcrunch.com/2011/11/09/crunchcrunch/
7. Founder Institute. "Startup Funding Benchmarks & Requirements." 2025. https://fi.co/benchmarks
8. Carta. "State of Private Markets: Q3 2024." https://info.carta.com/rs/214-BTD-103/images/State%20of%20Private%20Markets%20Q3%202024%20-%20Green.pdf?version=0
9. Software Equity Group. "2024 Annual SaaS Report." https://softwareequity.com/blog/rule-of-40/
10. Bain & Company. "Rule of 40 Study." 2017.
11. R&D World. "25 Landmark R&D-Heavy Tech Funding Rounds of 2024." https://www.rdworldonline.com/25-landmark-rd-heavy-tech-funding-rounds-of-2024/
12. AlleyWatch. "January 2025 US Venture Capital Fundraising Report."
13. Crunchbase. "After Slowing In 2023, US Median Round Size Again Growing." August 23, 2024. https://news.crunchbase.com/venture/us-median-round-size-growing-h1-2024/
14. Founder Institute. "Startup Funding Benchmarks & Requirements." 2025. https://fi.co/benchmarks
15. Carta. "State of Startup Compensation, H1 2024." September 30, 2024. https://carta.com/data/startup-compensation-h1-2024/
16. Carta. "State of Private Markets: Q1 2025." May 13, 2025. https://carta.com/data/state-of-private-markets-q1-2025/
17. Crunchbase. "Far Fewer Seed-Stage Startups Are Graduating To Series A — Raising The Risk Of Failure." January 29, 2025
(But also TL;DR)
To prepare a budget for your startup, begin by listing all potential expenses you anticipate in starting and operating your business. Next, organise these expenses into categories. After that, estimate your monthly revenue and calculate the total costs required to start and run your business.
Step 1: Determine and track your income sources.
Step 2: Make a list of your cost. Include both fixed and variable costs.
Step 3: Set achievable financial goals.
Step 4: Develop a plan to meet those goals.
Step 5: Put everything together to build your budget.
Step 6: Regularly review and revise your forecast to ensure it remains effective.
Capital budgeting for a startup involves allocating a set amount of funds for specific purposes, such as purchasing new equipment or expanding business operations. This process is crucial as it supports making strategic investments that are expected to yield long-term benefits for the startup.
(But also TL;DR)
To forecast cash flow for a startup, follow these steps:
Step 1: Create a sales forecast by estimating the revenue your products or services will generate over the forecast period.
Step 2: Develop a profit and loss forecast to understand your expected expenses and income.
Step 3: Prepare your cash flow forecast, which involves calculating expected cash inflows and outflows. This can often be done for longer-term by using assumptions around payment terms to forecast a Balance Sheet, and using the movements in Balance Sheet and Net Profit/Loss to calculate the cashflow.
Step 4: Consider ways of improving cash flow by improving your invoicing methods, considering short-term borrowing, and negotiate better payment terms to manage cash flow effectively.
The most accurate method for forecasting cash flow in the short-term is the direct method, which utilises actual cash flow data. In contrast, the indirect method is better suited for longer term forecasting using projected balance sheet movements and income statements to estimate future cash flows.
Cash flow is calculated by deducting cash outflows from cash inflows over a specific period. This calculation alongside forecasts of future cash flow helps determine if there is sufficient money available to sustain business.
To project cash flow over a three-year period, undertake the following steps:
Step 1: Collect historical financial data.
Step 2: Identify all expected cash inflows, which could include revenue, investment, grant income, etc.
Step 3: Estimate all anticipated cash outflows including expenses, suppliers that need to be paid, investments into assets, debt repayments, etc.
Step 4: Calculate the net cash flow by subtracting outflows from inflows.
Step 5: Consider your cash reserves and explore financing options if needed.
Step 6: Regularly review and adjust your projections to ensure accuracy and relevance.
(But also TL;DR)
A startup should think about hiring a Chief Financial Officer (CFO) when it begins to experience rapid growth, finds it challenging to manage finances, or needs to navigate complex investment scenarios. A seasoned financial professional can provide the necessary expertise to handle these challenges effectively.
You might need to hire a CFO or consider outsourcing this role if you notice any of the following signs: a decrease in gross profit margins despite increasing revenue, uncontrolled business growth, lack of cash reserves despite having a financially successful year, or a halt in business growth.
Recruiting a full-time CFO is an expensive hire. Given budget constraints and the need to prove the viability of your business idea, founders will often need to prioritise investing into building and commercialising their product. That's where CFO services for startups are a cost-effective solution for founders looking to take their financial management to the next level.